An Approach to Default Reasoning Based on a First-Order Conditional Logic
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper presents an approach to default reasoning based on an extension to classical first-order logic. In this approach, first -order logic is augmented with a “variable conditional” operator for representing default statements. Truth in the resulting logic is based on a possible worlds semantics: the default statement C-P is true just when p is true in the least exceptional worlds in which 01 is true. This system provides a basis for representing and reasoning about default statements. Inferences of default properties of individuals rely on two assumptions: first that the world being modelled by a set of sentences is as uniform as consistently possible and, second, that sentences that may consistently be assumed to be irrele\.ant to a default inference -are, in fact.-irrelevant to the inference. Two formulations of default inferencing are proposed. The first involves extending the set of defaults to include all combinations of irrelevant properties. The second involves assuming that the world being modelled is among the simplest worlds consistent with the defaults and with what is contingently known. In the end. the second approach is argued to be superior to the first.
منابع مشابه
Two-phase Exception Logic
In this paper we propose an exception logic { formalizing reasoning about exceptions. We use this logic to defend two claims. First, we argue that default logic { formalizing reasoning about default assumptions { is an extension of exception logic. A deconstruction argument shows that reasoning about exceptions is one of the rst principles of reasoning about default assumptions. Second, we argu...
متن کاملBelief Revision, Conditional Logic and Nonmonotonic Reasoning
We consider the connections between belief revision, conditional logic and nonmonotonic reasoning, using as a foundation the approach to theory change developed by Alchourrón, Gärdenfors and Makinson (the AGM approach). This is first generalized to allow the iteration of theory change operations to capture the dynamics of epistemic states according to a principle of minimal change of entrenchme...
متن کاملRelational Probabilistic Conditional Reasoning at Maximum Entropy
This paper presents and compares approaches for reasoning with relational probabilistic conditionals, i. e. probabilistic conditionals in a restricted first-order environment. It is well-known that conditionals play a crucial role for default reasoning, however, most formalisms are based on propositional conditionals, which restricts their expressivity. The formalisms discussed in this paper ar...
متن کاملA Ranking Semantics for First-Order Conditionals
Usually, default rules in the form of conditional statements are built on propositional logic, representing classes of individuals by propositional variables, as in “Birds fly, but penguins don’t”. Only few approaches have addressed the problem of giving formal semantics to first-order conditionals that allow (nonmonotonic) inferences both for classes and for individuals. In this paper, we pres...
متن کاملDeontic Modals: Why Abandon the Default Approach
John Horty has proposed an approach to reasoning with oughtpropositions which stands in contrast to the standard modal approach to deontic logic. Horty’s approach is based on default theories as known from the framework of Default Logic. It is argued that the approach cannot be extended beyond the most simple kinds of default theories and that it fails in particular to account for conditional o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Artif. Intell.
دوره 36 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1987